May 19, 2009

Don't let the truth get in the way of your mission.

There has been some rumblings that perhaps the comical look we gave to that original presentation was, shall we say embellished a little...Perhaps, however, we have from day one been truthful about everything that has taken place. For you naysayers...

Below you will find a copy of a letter that David's counsel wrote on his behalf, directed to both his appraiser and the facilitator. It does not take much to detect the tone of what they are trying to achieve. Further more when you start telling the appraiser what comp's to use speaks volumes for what you are trying to achive.

Dumbing down the cottage benefits only one person, David Symons.

Click photo to enlarge.







Now ask yourself, who is it that would buy that dump?

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interesting. Who bought the cottages sold Lakeside and Pinewoods?

How did the Lee's rebut this BS about landlocked cottage, etc?

Anonymous said...

Now, what price was David Slymons able to steal your cottage for again?

Anonymous said...

What a bunch of crap. And you still can't stay there in the winter.

Anonymous said...

And just who are these "financiers" that made it possible for Slymons to steal your cottage? Doesn't that put him in another "tenants in common" situation? WTF? Can you say "partition redux?" Those people must be coocoo to own real estate with duplicitous David.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know if they got hit yet with the Lakeside transfer fee?

Anonymous said...

Slymons must not've had the cash to steal the cottage on his own. But why didn't he pool resources with his slyme-spawn kids on the deal instead of involving others? That probably would have prevented the Lakeside transfer fee. Seems Mr. Slymons isn't as smart as he thinks he is!

Anonymous said...

Question: If the lakefront property is actually owned by the association, wouldn't the boathouse technically be association property? If so, why was it being factored into the appraisal?

Anonymous said...

Has the association ever actually blocked access to the lake on anybody who didn't pay their dues?

Anonymous said...

There really are no words for this kind of selfishness. He will get what he deserves.

Joey said...

You have to keep in mind that once this was handed over to the court appointed facilitator/mediator/receiver it was all in his hands. He took the path of least resistence and his only obligation was to sell the place. Fairness, accuracy, effort...didn't matter. In a partition case the court's only mission is to dispose of the mess as quickly as possible. If that meant pounding a nail in a note on a tree in the middle of the forest advertising a cottage for sale for $10... that was all that was required.

Anonymous said...

Since Prez Slymons did not buy the cottage with his own cash I would find it impossilbe for the party that bought the Lee cottage to avoid the Lakeside transfer fee.

The Prez should initiate a yearly party for himself called "The How Party"........for How stupid and greedy one person can be....then write an book called "How to screw your own family out of a family treasure"

Anonymous said...

The How Party is a wonderful idea! And I can hear the hostess call: "How. Party of one."

Actually, it would be a party of five, because all of the other "whats" would be included.

Now we just need to figure out "where", cause it ain't gonna be Lakeside.

Anonymous said...

So many questions... so few answers.

Joey said...

I just love the "How" party idea. And the "whats"... yeah, good stuff. Still..the lesson here..it can happen to anyone, get thee to a lawyer now to protect and preserve your cottage and do it NOW. That's the truth.