July 8, 2009

SYMON SAYS......

MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Dec. 8, 2008

NOW COMES the plaintiff.....by his attorneys, Sturtz and Sturtz, P.C., and hereby petitions this Honorable Court for Injunctive Relief....

4. That on or about November 24, 2008, apparently following the most recent motion in Court directing that the cottage has been sold, the Defendants announce, "The cottage has been reserved for the Christmas holiday period Dec. 23 through New Years", see exhibit #1 attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Plaintiff, DAVID C. SYMONS, objects to the cottage, which he has purchased, (not) being opened up to any parties for use during the Christmas holidays, or at any period of time.

5. That since this matter has been filed there have been numerous and repeated actions by parties which suggested the commision of waste or damage, including the painting of doors and "the internet saga Red Door Journal blog".

6. That it would appear from the e-mail, that while the cottage has been sold (not) to Mr. Symons, that any and all parties will be using the cottage.

7. The the Plaintiff is concerned about the commission of waste, turning on of water, reheating, lack of oil and other neglect that may be committed to the cottage by parties.

8. That Mr. David C. Symons is the current purchaser, and as the pruchaser has paid a large sum of money (not) and he is concerned about his investment and the condition that he may find the premises in if other third parties are allowed to use the cottage".


Ok, so David had NOT bought the cottage yet. He put a $5000 deposit down when he submitted his bid (per Mr. Meyer). Being accussed in court of causing waste??? Damage??? You have to be kidding me!!! We were the ones taking care of the place for years. He put in docks. Any efforts to take care of the cottage were refused by him. And he was worried???? What a boat load of you know what.

Meanwhile, Mr. Meyer was still trying to calculate costs, fees, etc. and the contents of the cottage were still up for grabs..stay tuned to part 2. of SYMONS SAYS......

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

So let me see if I understand this, he (David) says on one hand have a great time up there over the holidays and be sure to keep an eye on the fuel oil level, and then turns around and files another motion, this one to prevent a co-owner from using her cottage? Silly me to think otherwise, makes perfect sense!

Joey said...

That's right. He even called Kris to make sure all would be taken care of for our stay. Yeah.. nice huh?

Anonymous said...

"That's right. He even called Kris to make sure all would be taken care of for our stay. Yeah.. nice huh?"

Either the old goat has really bad alzheimer's, or Phil "Skirtz the Law" put him up to this legal nonsense. (probably to run up his own bills)

Phil Skurtz is a low life. He needs to be disbarred.

Anonymous said...

"The Plaintiff, DAVID C. SYMONS, objects to the cottage, which he has purchased, (not) being opened up to any parties for use during the Christmas holidays, or at any period of time."

"F" Slymie and the slyme cart he rode in on!

This is an outright lie! Slymie hadn't bought anything at that point. The Lees still owned their piece of the pie.

Did't your attorney present Slymie's email basically encouraging Josephine to use the place?

Anonymous said...

"numerous and repeated actions by parties which suggested the commision of waste or damage, including the painting of doors and "the internet saga Red Door Journal blog"."

Since when does painting a door constitute waste? This was just like a Spanish bullfight. Slymie saw red, and he got mad! Just like the bull (Y's) do. But sometimes in the end, the matadors win, don't they?

Anonymous said...

Back then, the Red Door Journal wasn't dishing anything. Barely divulged a thing. It is SO much better now.

Just your under average blogger said...

There was a reason for keeping things underwraps at that time. I had been warned earlier by the judge for comments attesting to his lack of manhood and testosterone. That's behind us now.

Anonymous said...

"That it would appear from the e-mail, that while the cottage has been sold (not) to Mr. Symons, that any and all parties will be using the cottage."

The cottage had not been sold! There was merely an (alleged) 5K deposit from Uncle Slymie. How could Phil "Skirtz the Law" Sturtz keep repeating this egregious lie? In official court motions?

Damn, there are so many grounds for an appeal here. Once you get this knocked out of Saginaw, you'll have a much better chance of a fair hearing.

Now Phil Sturtz, whose own slymieness rivals Uncle Slymie, relishes the thought of an appeal-- so he can keep padding the bills.

But, should the Lees ultimately prevail, as I expect they will-- Slymie will be responsible for ALL their legal bills, and pain and suffering to boot!

Phil will probably lose his license to practice law.

Poetic Justice.

Anonymous said...

"7. The the Plaintiff is concerned about the commission of waste, turning on of water, reheating, lack of oil and other neglect that may be committed to the cottage by parties."

Carol, I think it's time to change Uncle Slymie's diaper. Things are getting really Stinky around here.

Anonymous said...

So Slymie's game was to check on the fuel as well send the law after Mrs. Lee......did Slymie even have enough class to gift wrap the legal papers he sent his sister during the last Christmas holiday she would have at her cottage?

Watch out.......what will President Slymie do next?.......

Anonymous said...

"So Slymie's game was to check on the fuel as well send the law after Mrs. Lee"

That's right! He set her up! Slymie feigned approval and support of Josephine using the place, then behind her back, sends a Sheriff into camp to harass her, then instructs his gremlin attorney to file another motion filled with lies about how he bought the cottage and his irrational "fears" of damage.

Anonymous said...

"and his irrational "fears" of damage."

Someone's "damaged" here and it ain't the cottage.

Hopefully there are some good mental health facilities in Roscommon or Grayling, because he may go completely around the twist later this summer.

Anonymous said...

Slymie baited Josephine into thinking it was cool with him for her to enjoy HER cottage one last time over the holidays.

Then he switched, and became the Grinch whole stole Christmas.

Anonymous said...

What a total scumbag he is. If there are some folks around that like slymie they won't like him now. Or his scamming kids. How could anyone do this to their own sister? come on really WTF!!!!
And still show his face in Lakeside? Get him outta here

Anonymous said...

Even if you decide not to appeal I would sue him for misconception of justice. He lied during this whole process and he should be accounted for a large sum of money. This was totally wrong what he did and also phil sturtz. He's supposed to be an attorney and now he has this on his back. I hope to hell he loses something. License or he should be sued along with slymie. I'm just in shock that this happened to you and pissed off.

Joey said...

The judge was fully aware of where we all were in this mess. This was Phil's usual style. He'd been yelling for a long time that "David bought the cottage". The money? Ha...that took a few more months before anything was sold.

Anonymous said...

"The judge was fully aware of where we all were in this mess. This was Phil's usual style."

Why wasn't Phil Sturtz held in contempt of court, and sanctioned for misrepresenting the facts?

Sounds like Skirtie was awfully close to the Judge, and Mr. Meyer.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like Skirtie was awfully close to the Judge, and Mr. Meyer.


Oh for sure, They had been planning this for a long time. Wine and dine and pretty soon you can get what you want.

Anonymous said...

I think we are dealing with.....
Resident I mean President Evil!!
Send him back to his condo.....they probably did not want him there either.