January 30, 2009
Yesterdays confusion.....cleared up perhaps
The major question of the yesterday afternoons testimony centered around when this photo was taken and how could we be lying about it. You see, there was a date at the top of this posting that showed Jan 5th, and it was assumed that because mother and Joey had left on the 29th of December, someone had to be lying, and someone had to have taken that photo. Not sure of it's relevancy but hey, I am not an attorney. So for those who could not figure this out at first glance allow me:
NO SNOW ON THE FRONT PORCH
JOEY HAS NO SHOES ON
DOOR WAS REPAINTED SHORTLY AFTERWARDS ON ORDERS BY THE PLAINTIFF (perhaps asking him when, might have been my first question)
THE DATE AT THE TOP IS NOT WHEN THIS PHOTO WAS TAKEN, IT IS THE DATE IT WAS POSTED
I hope that clears up what any confusion on the plaintiffs part concerning this mystery photo!