Yesterdays confusion.....cleared up perhaps

The major question of the yesterday afternoons testimony centered around when this photo was taken and how could we be lying about it. You see, there was a date at the top of this posting that showed Jan 5th, and it was assumed that because mother and Joey had left on the 29th of December, someone had to be lying, and someone had to have taken that photo. Not sure of it's relevancy but hey, I am not an attorney. So for those who could not figure this out at first glance allow me:


NO SNOW ON THE FRONT PORCH
JOEY HAS NO SHOES ON
DOOR WAS REPAINTED SHORTLY AFTERWARDS ON ORDERS BY THE PLAINTIFF (perhaps asking him when, might have been my first question)
THE DATE AT THE TOP IS NOT WHEN THIS PHOTO WAS TAKEN, IT IS THE DATE IT WAS POSTED

I hope that clears up what any confusion on the plaintiffs part concerning this mystery photo!

David Symons' attorney plead's with the judge to jail mother...

Unbelievable, simply unbelievable. I can't make this stuff up folks, and yes I have used that line before.

I really thought this morning we would finally be done. Preliminary discussions earlier in the week led us to believe it would be wrapped up this morning. We had agreed to a number of issues, including a confidentiality agreement that would have prevented me from have this conversation with you all. He had agreed to pay mother $7,000.00 to cover her legal expenses pertaining to this show cause motion, it was to"go away", and nary a word would be said ever again. We had agreed to drop any further attempts for an appeal, Done, finished, all that was left was some accounting house cleaning and the bye bye's. Yea....Right

We should have known better, this behavior has been a benchmark of his. Un- trustworthy to say the least.

Nope, he pulled the same Houdini stunt today that he pulled after the first facilitation meeting and then the second meeting. The entire morning spent sitting and waiting while the attorny fee's keep piling up. We made one final attempt to settle this to no avail. Suddenly the man who said this was taking so long decided to make it last a whole lot longer. Honestly, we were 5 minutes away from having this all wraped up and done with.

So on with the show cause hearing. You know the one where he trys to have his sister thrown in jail, yea, that one.

When cross examined he admitted that he wasn't doing this for the money, or because he thought she would destroy the place if she went one last time to her cottage for the Christmas holidays. His reason was because things were taking too long. TAKING TOO LONG So adding additional time and costs is the solution, I am not buying it. He is a mean and nasty person and not one member of his family could or would, stand up and say you're doing the wrong thing. Not one! They are as spineless as he is.

His motion sought $3,500.00 in damages, plus costs, yet did not ask for jail time.

That was until 4:58PM today. He had his attorney stand before the judge and plead for him to sentence mother to jail. I am not kidding.

To date his lowest hour yet.

He walked away again, the delays keep coming.

Not done yet .........

Getting interesting.......

We didn't!

Off target but gosh I like this guy!

Tomorrow.......

Who blinks first.....

This couldn't be what He thought sitting down and working things out would be like........

Or could it be?

Last warning about comments......

Keep it classy, no name calling or disparaging remarks. We collectively are better than that.

What does David Symons hope to achive now?

I now hear that mother's original attorney has been served with a subpoena to appear in court on January 29th regarding this contempt of court charge he seems hell bent on pursuing.

I've said it before and it deserves repeating: What does he expect to achieve with this recent frivolous motion, (one of many) aside from the $3,500.00 he is asking for. Is he short on funds and needs it to consummate the sale? I am at a loss to determine how he could have been damaged so severely from using the cottage, when he never had any intentions of using it over the holidays.

Now keep in mind, he owns not a scintilla more of that cottage than mother does, yet, he seems to think it's his and no one Else's. Again, no money has been paid, no deed signed there has been no consummated sale. The owners of record are still Stuart deGues & Katy Jenkins, 33.3% collectively, David Symons, 33.3% and Josephine Lee, 33.3%

It would have been nice had the judge given his reason(s) for siding with the plaintiff, he choose not to, We are left to our own imaginations as to what his justification was.....